rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

สล็อตฟรี_การพนันฟุตบอล กฎหมาย_เกมยิงปลา

For 413 women all across Canada, May 25th, 2009, was a day of vindication. It brought resolution, albeit bitter sweet, to an equality dispute, ongoing since 1972 and exemplified the expeditious utility of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in dealing with matters of discrimination.

Employed as medical adjudicators, this predominately female group of nurses works with medical advisors, a predominately male group of doctors, to evaluate applications for the CPP Disability Benefit Program and determine eligibility.

Since the position's creation, the adjudicators (nurses) have been categorized as program administrators, whereas the advisors (doctors) are categorized as medical officers despite the overlap of duties between the two positions and the need for adjudicators to utilize their medical science expertise. This classification differential has lead to a deprivation of professional recognition, remuneration commensurate with their qualifications, including payment of their licensing fees, as well as training and career advancement opportunities.

After rendering its initial decision on liability in 2007, which found the federal government responsible for discrimination on the basis of sex, this recent Canadian Human Rights Tribunal ruling addresses the issue of remedy. As a result, a new subgroup within the Health Services Occupational Group and the Nursing Classification will be created. This proper categorization will ensure the work of medical adjudicators is viewed within its proper professional context moving into the future.

But what of the women who have endured the longevity of this battle and are now coming to the end of their careers? Unfortunately, no compensation for wage loss was awarded nor compensation for pain and suffering (except in two circumstances). Instead, these 413 women are left with only the sense that they participated in the righting of a historical wrong and will recuperate their legal fees. Not one national headline has regarded the conclusion of this struggle newsworthy - and perhaps most regretfully of all, the women that will come to enjoy the fruits of their predecessors will be unaware of the efforts undertook to claim their right to equality.

It is truly a shame that this victory will not be more widely celebrated - for it strikes at the heart of another battle which is developing today and will have devastating repercussions into the future.

An initial effort to resist the inclusion of the Public Sector Equitable Compensation Act in the last Federal Budget by all opposition parties seems to have been forgotten and the legislation was enacted in February of this year.

The Act has eliminated the option for women to file pay equity complaints with the Canadian Human Rights Commission, instead, making pay equity a responsibility of collective bargaining between unions and employers. If employees have had their pay equity rights violated, they may lodge a complaint with the Public Service Labour Relations Board, a tribunal responsible for settling collective bargaining disputes for the federal public service. For non-unionized employees the options are even more restricting.

The consequences of this retrogressive legislation are twofold: it removes pay equity from being recognized as a right and a violation of such being viewed as discrimination, as well as, eliminating the support which the Human Rights Commission offers disenfranchised complainants. The two factors combine to provide substantial erosion to the protection and promotion of equality rights within Canada.

May 25th, 2009, was a good day for 413 federally employed nurses spread across Canada, a day when dignity was restored.

The AHRC applauds your efforts in reclaiming your right to equality and hopes your fortitude will be passed on as an example for others facing discrimination and oppression.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading เกมส์ยิงปลาW88 www.mydailyproxies.com than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

เกมส์ยิงปลาW88 www.mydailyproxies.com has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! เกมส์ยิงปลาW88 www.mydailyproxies.com embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on เกมส์ยิงปลาW88 www.mydailyproxies.com and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.